Category Archives

Archive of posts published in the category: Global Warming

Consensus is a Political Act- Not a Scientific Act

Outside the ‘Consensus’–Notes of a Climate Change ‘Denier’ –  by Peter Wood excerpts: In time, scientific controversies get resolved, often by the emergence of new kinds of evidence that no one originally imagined. Views that are maintained, to some degree, by

Read More

97% Bullshit

That’s a 0.3% consensus, not 97% by Joanne Nova Excerpt: We’ve already found enough flaws, but Christopher Monckton analyzes John Cook’s 97% consensus paper and sharpens the scythe. He finds: It should never have been done, it’s an unscientific method

Read More

Lukewarmers

Climate Forecast: Muting the Alarm in the Wall Street Journal by Matt Ridley Excerpt: In climate science, the real debate has never been between “deniers” and the rest, but between “lukewarmers,” who think man-made climate change is real but fairly

Read More

Science is Not a Democracy

from Popular Technology. Net 97% Study Falsely Classifies Scientists’ Papers, according to the scientists that published them Shaviv: “Science is not a democracy, even if the majority of scientists think one thing (and it translates to more papers saying so),

Read More

Embracing Skepticism

from A Change fo Climate by Mark Steyn: “Climate Change Not A Top Worry In US,” reports Gallup, deadpan. Washington’s Potemkin parliament can hold as manypajama parties as it wants, but Big Climate absolutism is going nowhere, and the savvier scientists –

Read More

Genghis Khan and AGW

  From The National Review Online, Alec Torres writes  Global Warming & the Mongolian Empire’s Rise: Now a recent study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences argues that there is a correlation between increasing global temperatures and the rise of the Mongolian

Read More

The Need to Validate the Models

from Investors Business Daily, Democrats, NASA Scientists And Global Warming: Rather than bash deniers, or fence them into some lepers ghetto as Apple CEO Tim Cook and Virgin CEO Richard Branson seem to want, the senators should have invited the

Read More

The Data Doesn’t Matter

From American Thinker, The Dead Parrot of Climate Change Said shopkeeper is exemplified in real life by Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research: “The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re

Read More

Science- The Method vs The Institution

From Faith in Science by Glenn Reynolds in the New York Post: Excerpts: In fact, given that Americans have grown broadly more skeptical of institutions in general, it’s not surprising that conservatives are more skeptical of scientific institutions than they

Read More

Oversold Certainty

From Patrick Michaels atForbes Will The Overselling Of Global Warming Lead To A New Scientific Dark Age? Excerpts: Science changed dramatically in the 1970s, when the reward structure in the profession began to revolve around the acquisition of massive amounts

Read More

Health Care and Global Warming

The utter failure of the ACA website roll out is just a cover for the fact that the real failure is the plan itself.  The shitty website does not explain the cancellations and the painfully higher costs. But the disaster

Read More

The Corruption of Consensus

from Mark Steyn in The National Review Online, Ice Everywhere, But No Hockey Sticks: Global warming will kill us. Global cooling will kill us. And if it’s 54 and partly cloudy, you should probably flee for your life right now.

Read More

97 Per Cent

James Taylor writes in Forbes: Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring ’97-Percent Consensus’ Claims: Viewing the Cook paper in the best possible light, Cook and colleagues can perhaps claim a small amount of wiggle room in their classifications because the explicit

Read More

The IPCC and The Answers You Get

In American Thinker,  IPCC ‘s Bogus Evidence for Global Warming by S. Fred Singer: Excerpt: In spite of much effort, the IPCC has never succeeded in demonstrating that climate change is significantly affected by human activities — and in particular,

Read More

Adjusting the Facts

From National Review Online, Jeremy Carl writes Liberal Denial on Climate Change and Energy. Excerpts: Taken as a whole, the Golden State poll suggests that many liberals have a deeply ideological view of energy and climate and policy, one in

Read More

Subjective Peer Review

from the Climate Blog, Watts Up With That,  Why Climate Science is Fallible by Anthony Watts,  Guest essay by Dr. David Deming: Peer review is a highly unreliable process that produces nothing but opinion. A studyconducted in 2010 concluded that reviewers

Read More

Political Science of the IPCC

By Donna LaFramboise In The Wall Street Journal Warming Up for Another Climate-Change Report Every six years, a U.N. panel issues its findings, and the media hail them as definitive. Skepticism may be in order. Excerpt: When the IPCC issues

Read More

Global Cooling

Latest result of global warming: cooler temperatures by Michael Barone The science is settled, alarmists like to insist. But science is never settled; scientific theories are by definition falsifiable and sometimes are falsified. Recently Interior Secretary Sally Jewell assured an audience

Read More

“The Perils of Extrapolation”

Andrew Stuttaford write Our Climate Change Cathedral in the National Review. Excerpts: Inevitably, Darwall is unable to resist mentioning earlier doomsayers that have got it spectacularly wrong. These include old Thomas Malthus, the Nixon era’s Club of Rome, and William

Read More