Jonah Goldberg writes in National Review Online, Capitalism vs Capitalists

Excerpts:

“Every ten years I quote the same adage from the late Austrian analyst Willi Schlamm, ….. ‘The trouble with socialism is socialism. The trouble with capitalism is capitalists.’”

If by “capitalist” you mean someone who cares more about his own profit than yours; if you mean someone who cares more about providing for his family than providing for yours; if you mean someone who trusts that he is a better caretaker of his own interests and desires than a bureaucrat he’s never met, often in a city he’s never been to: then we are all capitalists. Because, by that standard, capitalism isn’t some far-off theory about the allocation of capital; it is a commonsense description of what motivates pretty much all human beings everywhere.

At the end of the day, it is entirely natural for humans to work the system – any system – for their own betterment, whatever kind of system that may be.

The problem with socialism is socialism, because there are no socialists. Socialism is a system based upon an assumption about human nature that simply isn’t true. I can design a perfect canine community in which dogs never chase squirrels or groom their nether regions in an indelicate manner. But the moment I take that idea from the drawing board to the real world, I will discover that I cannot get dogs to behave against their nature – at least not without inflicting a terrible amount of punishment.

And it’s also why the problem with capitalism is capitalists. Some people will always abuse the system and take things too far. Some will do it out of the hubris of intellect. Some will do it out of the venality of greed.

We are fond of saying that the answer to free-speech problems is more free speech. But we seem incapable of grasping that sometimes – and only sometimes – the solution to capitalism’s problems is more capitalism.

HKO comments-  Jonah Goldberg’s last analogy to free speech brilliantly clarifies the absurdity of our response to the financial meltdown.   Can you imagine a problem caused by free speech to be addressed by restricting free speech?  Our right to free speech is too precious to even consider such a solution. Yet our most precious liberties to address our own health care and financial future is being massively disrupted.

Our banking system and our health care system  are some of the most heavily regulated businesses in our country and yet we exclusively blame the free market for their problems. Instead of addressing the massive role played by government interference we are passing laws that require more interference.

“A dynamic economy will always have booms and busts. But the story of the past twenty-five years is that Washington has created a financial system that cannot withstand the destructive part of creative destruction – necessary for free markets- without destroying the economy.  We’ve grown so accustomed to government-subsidized failure in finance that we feel we have no choice. In accepting subsidized failure, we harm America’s trust in free markets, we harm the world’s trust in American markets, and we harm the financial innovation that advances the economy rather than smothers it.”

From After the Fall:  Saving Capitalism from Wall Street- and Washington by Nicloe Gelinas

“Could free markets have sorted out the mess without extraordinary government action? Yes, but only by destroying the remains of the financial system and possibly putting tens of millions of people out of work. Despite virulent public opposition to the Bush bailouts, society would not have tolerated the price that a sudden free-market correction of decades of financial excess would have exacted. The consequences of standing by while the markets did their work, correcting their own and government’s mistakes, would have been disastrous.”

“The administration’s response may have staved off depression, though that outcome is not assured. But the government has severely damaged four elements upon which free markets and the future well-being of the nation depend: prices, disclosure, failure, and fairness. Lawmakers and regulators have harmed the faith of global investors and regular citizens alike in American free markets- a faith essential to growth and progress. President Obama has made the problems worse.”

From After the Fall:  Saving Capitalism from Wall Street- and Washington by Nicloe Gelinas

If you have to read only one book about the recent financial  fiasco, this is it.

“Despite elite concerns of a public backlash against capitalism, it has been the public, not Wall Street or Washington, that has supported capitalism all along.  Financiers were disconcertingly quick to run straight into the governments arms, while the public has stuck up for markets and fought against taxpayer subsidy of failure. The hope for free markets is “political constraint,” says former St. Louis Fed president William Poole.”

“The public intuitively grasps unfairness when it sees it. In poll after poll, citizens have opposed bailout after bailout, not just for the banks but for their own neighbors.  This opposition is not a reflection of a heartless and mindless populism. Ordinary people understand that bailouts have perversely punished individuals and companies that acted responsibly, creating an incentive to act irresponsibly in the future.  They can perceive the difference between a government that acts as an honest, transparent referee of competitors and one that acts as a guarantor of perceived favorites.”

From After the Fall:  Saving Capitalism from Wall Street- and Washington by Nicole Gelinas