Rebel Yid on Twitter Rebel Yid on Facebook
Print This Post Print This Post

Perspective on Casualties

405,399
364,511
13,283
9,556
7,099

405,399- U.S. military fatalities in WWII

364,511 – Military fatalities in the Civil War

13,283- U.S. military fatalities in the Mexican War

9,556- Total U.S. military deaths during the PEACETIME of 1980-83

7,099 total U.S. military deaths during the first four years of the Iraqi War from 2003 – 2006

Also since 1998 5.4 million people have been killed in the Republic of the Congo, and as many as 45,000 per month continue to die.

Tips to Randall Hoven in “Iraq and Its Lessons”, Part 2 in American Thinker 12.29.08

Share/Save/Bookmark

Print This Post Print This Post

The More Disproportionate the Better

Israel is often criticized for disproportionate response to their terrorist foes. Yet any successful military solution is disproportionate. It is the only humane way to fight a war. A war is not a field game designed to be fair and equal, to minimize the game spread. It is meant to defeat an enemy and eliminate a threat.

If a war was fought ‘tit for tat’ it would go on forever and sustain more casualties than necessary. The parties would slowly bleed, reconstruction would never begin, and no one would invest in and develop anything without some property security. Short term ferocity is the humane way to fight a war.

In Gaza Hamas must be not merely restrained, they must be eliminated. They have shown no interest in peace and the sooner they are eliminated the sooner both sides will be at peace.

The more disproportionate the response the better.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Print This Post Print This Post

The Shortest Distance a Bullet Need Travel

from

Looking for Trouble
Adventures in a Broken World
by Ralph Peters

“Intelligence officers worry too much about dead facts and too little about their antagonist’s delusions. What men believe about themselves is often more important than their reality- and certainly more useful, if you must fight them. Measure the difference between an enemy’s mundane existence and his self-image and you arrive at the shortest distance your bullet need travel.”

Share/Save/Bookmark

Print This Post Print This Post

Special Ops Panty Hose

When some of our special ops soldiers met up with the Northern Allaince in Afghanistan they had to quickly adapt to horseback to cover their operational territory. Saddles sores became so severe it became a disability. They requested hundreds of pounds of vaseline.

But the fine dust of the region mixed with the vaseline and turned it into an abrasive gel making the problem worse. The ever adaptable soldiers found the solution.

Panty hose. So much for ‘don’t ask, don’t tell.’

from War and Decision by Doug Feith.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Print This Post Print This Post

America’s Secret Weapon

Ralph Peters, a critic of the Rumsfeld fiasco period, is high on Defense Secretary Robert Gates and his selection of soldiers’ soldiers to run the war. The article, Gates’s Grand Slam.

General Robert Patraeus will take over US Central Command.

Lt General Ray Odierno will take over as head of the forces in Iraq.

Lt. General Peter Chiarelli will take Odierno’s place in the Pentagon.

It seems that we have often fumbled early in our conflicts, but changed and adapted to the reality and achieved victory. England did not quit after Dunkirk. While critics and cynical commentators lament the lack of a plan, the reality is that adaptability is far more important. It is America’s secret weapon.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Print This Post Print This Post

Rules of Engagement - Marcus Luttrell’s Story

Marcus Luttrell of Seal Team 10 was with 3 other Seals on Operation Redwing in the Hindu Kush of Afghanistan searching for Ben Sharmak, a high level Al Qaeda operative in a Taliban stronghold .
Navy Seals are the toughest of the toughest. You have be tremendously fit to even be considered for training and only 1 in 5 make it through the final training. They are crossed trained in every area of combat known.
Luttrell and Mickey, Danny and Axe are observing a village looking for their target; they are hidden motionless when a goat herder, his two sons and a bunch of goats walk upon their position. They face three unarmed civilians. If they kill them they violate the rules of engagement; if they let them go they risk that they will bring hords of the Taliban upong them. After serious arguments the team lets them go, but Marcus knew it was a serious mistake.
Hours later the four Navy Seals are engaged in a horrific gun battle, surrounded by over a hundred vicious angry Taliban. The battle rages for hours, they retreat, slide and fall down steep mountainous rocky terrain. Marcus’ three buddies are killed, but not until they have been hit repeatedly with bullets and RPGs. They probably took out half of the Taliban force around them.
A rescue team is dispatched during the fire fight with 16 soldiers including 8 Navy Seals. A shoulder fired missile destroys the MH-47 Chinook helicopter with every one on board.
Marcus survives with fractured vertbrae from the fall, shrapnel in his leg and a bullet wound. An Afghan villager helps him and protects him from the Taliban who are searching for him. He is eventually found by a Army Ranger search party and returned to base to fight again. He lost 30 pounds in 6 days.
His story is in “Lone Survivor”, a gripping tale.
The rules of engagement cost 19 of the best warriors we have and probably 100 Taliban fighters. It was the worst special ops loss we have ever faced. Each one of these Seals is more valuable from a purely military perspective that a billion dollar plane.
It is ridiculous to restrict our soldiers when we are fighting an enemy who knows no rules and has no compassion for anyone other than their distorted pathological followers.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Print This Post Print This Post

Two Ironies of Modern War

Number 1.

The greater the military’s ability to isolate combatants, the longer the war will last. Israel and the United States have developed incredible precision to take out enemy combatants while sparing civilian lives. This is the result of the higher moral code these armies operate under and the reality of fighting movements instead of countries.

Yet in wars past they ended from exhaustion not just defeat on the field of battle. In WWII we won as much from economic superiority as from military courage. We were just able to outlast the enemy and replace tanks and planes faster than they could.

The more the civilians are protected from the consequences of the combatants they harbor, the less likely they will surrender and turn against their parasitic vipers, and the longer the conflict will last.

Number 2

The greater the presence of the media (in western cultures) to report on military engagements, the more brutal they will become.

The longer a war rages on, the greater the chance that the press will report on the flawed strategies, civilian casualties, and inevitable brutal tactics. This weakens civilian support and increases political posturing.

The result is the military will take to using overwhelming force to win the war quickly. The military knows but will relearn anyhow that “short term ferocity saves lives” and that “victory forgives”.

HKO

Share/Save/Bookmark

WELCOME

Welcome to Rebel Yid where everything is relevant. Perspectives from Henry Oliner. Frustrated by the lack of depth in most media; we aim to discover the dimension of ideas beyond the left/ right, red/blue, and liberal/conservative thinking. We write about economics, politics, power, history, religion and culture. We are enthralled with most things American but skeptical of ethnocentric biases and group think. Clarity and discovery is often found with humor.

Archives

Rebel Yid on Facebook

@rebelyid on Twitter