I have posted a few articles contending there were nuclear weapons development in Iraq. This article in the Jerusalem Post contends that the very early stage facility in Syria taken out by the Israelis a few months ago orginated in Iraq.

I am deeply interested as to why this attack has received such little press. The attack was acknowledged but none of the critical details have been explored at all. Somewhat contrary to this piece John Bolton hypothesized that the North Koreans were the source of the nuclear facility in Syria.

an excerpt:

As Loftus summarized, “The gist of the new evidence is this: Roughly one-quarter of Saddam’s WMD was destroyed under UN pressure during the early to mid 1990s. Saddam sold approximately another quarter of his weapons stockpile to his Arab neighbors during the mid-to-late-1990’s. The Russians insisted on removing another quarter in the last few months before the war. The last remaining WMD, the contents of Saddam’s nuclear weapons labs, were still inside Iraq on the day when the coalition forces arrived in 2003. His nuclear weapons equipment was hidden in enormous underwater warehouses beneath the Euphrates River. Saddam’s entire nuclear inventory was later stolen from these warehouses right out from under the Americans’ noses.”

Loftus then cites Israeli sources who claim that the Iraqi nuclear program was transferred to the Deir az Zour province in Syria.

HKO comments

for the new readers, John Loftus’s analysis is often quite bold and contrary to consensus. Just because it explains events does not necessarily make it right. On the other hand much of his analysis stands unrefuted and fills a gaping void left by the media.

In an older post also about Loftus’s analysis of the nuclear capabalities and their disposal. Note that he proposed IN MAY that some of Iraqi’s nuclear weapons made its way to Syria (that’s when I posted it), the Israeli’s attacked the facility in Iraq in September. Interesting, isn’t it?

print